# Radiometric dating - definition of radiometric dating by The Free Dictionary

Radiometric dating / Carbon dating

As one example, age is not a substance that accumulates over time, but dust is. The amount of dust can serve as a proxy for the amount of time since a room was last cleaned. Though age cannot be measured, the depth of dust can be measured. The estimated age is then computed based on the measured dust.

In order for this kind of estimate to work, certain assumptions must be used. One set of assumptions concerns the initial conditions. These are assumptions about the state of the system when it first started.

Radiometric dating, radioactive dating or radioisotope dating is a technique which is used to date materials such as rocks or carbon, in which trace radioactive impurities were selectively incorporated when they were formed. The method compares the abundance of a naturally occurring radioactive isotope within the material to the abundance of its decay products, which form at a known constant. Nov 13, Radiometric Dating and the Age of the Earth. Most people think that radioactive dating has proven the earth is billions of years old. After all, textbooks, media, and museums glibly present ages of millions of years as fact. Yet few people know how radiometric dating works or bother to ask what assumptions drive the conclusions. Hello everyone Radiometric Dating Origin Of Life,Urmi here, natural petite with slight curves.I'm passionate, playful and open minded. I love meeting new and interesting gentlemen who seek protected gsscthunder.comngly,I will pamper you with passionate /

In the case of estimating the time since a room was last cleaned by measuring dust, we might reasonably assume that the room had zero dust at the time of its cleaning. Another assumption concerns the rate of change of our proxy. In this case, we must know something about the rate at which dust accumulates. Often the rate can be measured in the present. We might measure the amount of dust at one time, and then measure it again a week later.

We might find that dust accumulates at one millimeter per week.

The friends Radiometric Dating Origin Of Life you find matter, of course. If you make friends at an evangelical religious retreat, you're a lot less likely to find a sex partner than if you make friends Radiometric Dating Origin Of Life among sex-positive people. So Radiometric Dating Origin Of Life it helps to make sex-positive friends. If / Define radiometric dating. radiometric dating synonyms, radiometric dating pronunciation, radiometric dating translation, English dictionary definition of radiometric dating. the age of an object based on the concentration of a particular radioactive isotope contained within it and the half-life . Radiometric dating proves that the earth is millions upon millions of years old - or does it? Join us for an insightful exploration with an entertaining presentation provided by our association with Answers In Genesis. Are you ready to find out what true life is? If you are, please click here.

But we must still make an assumption about the rate at which dust accumulated in the past. Perhaps dust always accumulates at the same rate it does today. But it is difficult to know for certain; hence, this remains an assumption. In the case of our hypothetical example, we might assume that no one has gone into the room and added dust, or blown dust away using a fan.

The assumptions of initial conditions, rates, and closed-ness of the system are involved in all scientific attempts to estimate age of just about anything whose origin was not observed. Suppose a room has 5 millimeters of dust on its surfaces. If dust accumulates at one millimeter per week and always has, if no one has disturbed the room, and if the room started with zero dust at the time of its cleaning, we can reasonably estimate the time since the last cleaning as five weeks.

Our estimate will be as good as our assumptions. If any of the assumptions is wrong, so will our age estimate be wrong. The problem with scientific attempts to estimate age is that it is rarely possible to know with any certainty that our starting assumptions are right. In radiometric dating, the measured ratio of certain radioactive elements is used as a proxy for age.

Radiometric dating. packing of molecules into protocols, origin of self-replicating molecules. Earth's early atmosphere likely contained water vapor and chemicals. released by volcanic eruptions (nitrogen, nitrogen oxides, carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia, hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide) half-life, the time required for half the parent. Oct 27, All radiometric dating methods used on rocks assume that the half-life of the decay has always been what it is today. But we now have compelling evidence that this assumption is false. And since the decay rate was much faster in the past, those who do not compensate for this will end up with age-estimates that are vastly inflated from the true. Scientists measure the ages of rock layers on Earth using radiometric dating. Radioactivity also gave the history of life an absolute calendar. By measuring the atoms produced by these breakdowns inside rocks, physicists were able to estimate their ages (right). And by comparing the ratios of those atoms to atoms from meteorites, they could.

Radioactive elements are atoms that are unstable; they spontaneously change into other types of atoms. For example, potassium is radioactive.

Creation v. Evolution: How Carbon Dating WorksThe number 40 refers to the sum of protons 19 and neutrons 21 in the potassium nucleus. Most potassium atoms on earth are potassium because they have 20 neutrons. Potassium and potassium are isotopes - elements with the same number of protons in the nucleus, but different numbers of neutrons.

Potassium is stable, meaning it is not radioactive and will remain potassium indefinitely. No external force is necessary. The conversion happens naturally over time. The time at which a given potassium atom converts to argon atom cannot be predicted in advance.

It is apparently random. However, when a sufficiently large number of potassium atoms is counted, the rate at which they convert to argon is very consistent. Think of it like popcorn in the microwave. You cannot predict when a given kernel will pop, or which kernels will pop before other kernels.

But the rate of a large group of them is such at after 1. This number has been extrapolated from the much smaller fraction that converts in observed time frames. Different radioactive elements have different half-lives.

The potassium half-life is 1.

But the half-life for uranium is about 4. The carbon half-life is only years. Cesium has a half-life of 30 years, and oxygen has a half-life of only The answer has to do with the exponential nature of radioactive decay. The rate at which a radioactive substance decays in terms of the number of atoms per second that decay is proportional to the amount of substance.

## radiometric dating

So after one half-life, half of the substance will remain. After another half-life, one fourth of the original substance will remain. Another half-life reduces the amount to one-eighth, then one-sixteenth and so on. The substance never quite vanishes completely, until we get down to one atom, which decays after a random time.

Since the rate at which various radioactive substances decay has been measured and is well known for many substances, it is tempting to use the amounts of these substances as a proxy for the age of a volcanic rock. After 1. So, if you happened to find a rock with 1 microgram of potassium and a small amount of argon, would you conclude that the rock is 1.

If so, what assumptions have you made? In the previous hypothetical example, one assumption is that all the argon was produced from the radioactive decay of potassium But is this really known? How do you know for certain that the rock was not made last Thursday, already containing significant amounts of argon and with only 1 microgram of potassium? In a laboratory, it is possible to make a rock with virtually any composition. Ultimately, we cannot know. But there is a seemingly good reason to think that virtually all the argon contained within a rock is indeed the product of radioactive decay.

Volcanic rocks are formed when the lava or magma cools and hardens. But argon is a gas. Since lava is a liquid, any argon gas should easily flow upward through it and escape. Thus, when the rock first forms, it should have virtually no argon gas within it. But as potassium decays, the argon content will increase, and presumably remain trapped inside the now-solid rock.

So, by comparing the argon to potassium ratio in a volcanic rock, we should be able to estimate the time since the rock formed. This is called a model-age method. In this type of method, we have good theoretical reasons to assume at least one of the initial conditions of the rock. The initial amount of argon when the rock has first hardened should be close to zero. Yet we know that this assumption is not always true.

We know this because we have tested the potassium-argon method on recent rocks whose age is historically known.

# Radiometric dating origin of life

That is, brand new rocks that formed from recent volcanic eruptions such as Mt. Helens have been age-dated using the potassium-argon method.

Their estimated ages were reported as hundreds of thousands of years based on the argon content, even though the true age was less than 10 years. Since the method has been shown to fail on rocks whose age is known, would it make sense to trust the method on rocks of unknown age? But many secular scientists continue to trust the potassium-argon model-age method on rocks of unknown age. If so, then their true ages are much less than their radiometric age estimates.

The age estimate could be wrong by a factor of hundreds of thousands. But how would you know? We must also note that rocks are not completely solid, but porous. And gas can indeed move through rocks, albeit rather slowly. So the assumption that all the produced argon will remain trapped in the rock is almost certainly wrong.

And it is also possible for argon to diffuse into the rock of course, depending on the relative concentration. So the system is not as closed as secularists would like to think. There are some mathematical methods by which scientists attempt to estimate the initial quantity of elements in a rock, so that they can compensate for elements like argon that might have been present when the rock first formed.

Such techniques are called isochron methods. They are mathematically clever, and we may explore them in a future article. However, like the model-age method, they are known to give incorrect answers when applied to rocks of known age. And neither the model-age method nor the isochron method are able to assess the assumption that the decay rate is uniform.

As we will see below, this assumption is very dubious. Years ago, a group of creation scientists set out to explore the question of why radiometric dating methods give inflated age estimates. We know they do because of the aforementioned tests on rocks whose origins were observed.

But why? Which of the three main assumptions initial conditions are known, rate of decay is known, the system is close is false?

## Radiometric dating

To answer this question, several creation geologists and physicists came together to form the RATE research initiative R adioisotopes and the A ge of T he E arth. This multi-year research project engaged in several different avenues of study, and found some fascinating results.

As mentioned above, the isochron method uses some mathematical techniques in an attempt to estimate the initial conditions and assess the closed-ness of the system. However, neither it nor the model-age method allow for the possibility that radioactive decay might have occurred at a different rate in the past. In other words, all radiometric dating methods assume that the half-life of any given radioactive element has always been the same as it is today.

If that assumption is false, then all radiometric age estimates will be unreliable. As it turns out, there is compelling evidence that the half-lives of certain slow-decaying radioactive elements were much smaller in the past. This may be the main reason why radiometric dating often gives vastly inflated age estimates. First, a bit of background information is in order.

Most physicists had assumed that radioactive half-lives have always been what they are today. Many experiments have confirmed that most forms of radioactive decay are independent of temperature, pressure, external environment, etc. In other words, the half-life of carbon is years, and there is nothing you can do to change it. Given the impossibility of altering these half-lives in a laboratory, it made sense for scientists to assume that such half-lives have always been the same throughout earth history.

But we now know that this is wrong. In fact, it is very wrong. More recently, scientists have been able to change the half-lives of some forms of radioactive decay in a laboratory by drastic amounts. However, by ionizing the Rhenium removing all its electronsscientists were able to reduce the half-life to only 33 years!

In other words, the Rhenium decays over 1 billion times faster under such conditions. Thus, any age estimates based on Rhenium-Osmium decay may be vastly inflated. The RATE research initiative found compelling evidence that other radioactive elements also had much shorter half-lives in the past. Several lines of evidence suggest this. But for brevity and clarity, I will mention only one. This involves the decay of uranium into lead Unlike the potassium-argon decay, the uranium-lead decay is not a one-step process.

Rather, it is a step process. Uranium decays into thorium, which is also radioactive and decays into polonium, which decays into uranium, and so on, eventually resulting in lead, which is stable. A method for determining the age of an object based on the concentration of a particular radioactive isotope contained within it.

The amount of the isotope in the object is compared to the amount of the isotope's decay products. The object's approximate age can then be figured out using the known rate of decay of the isotope. Radiocarbon dating is one kind of radiometric dating, used for determining the age of organic remains that are less than 50, years old. For inorganic matter and for older materials, isotopes of other elements, such as potassium, uranium, and strontium, are used.

Dating rocks by the known rate of decay of radioactive elements that they contain. Mentioned in? References in periodicals archive? The University of Cologne: Habitation in high mountain regions: Humans settled near glaciers earlier than previously believed. Based on the radiometric dating of various archaeological materials, this site is the earliest long-term dwelling in a high mountain region known to us anywhere in the world, said the first author of the study, Dr Gtz Ossendorf from the Department of Prehistoric Archaeology.

Germany : Habitation in high mountain regions: Humans settled near glaciers earlier than previously believed. Using radiometric datingthe scientists discovered that the nightshade family is at least 12 million years older than originally thought. To reach to their findings, the researchers used radiometric dating on the bone to determine its date.